Subscribe now

WHEN supernova 1987A exploded 12 years ago, stellar debris was ejected in a
narrow jet travelling at close to the speed of light. Astronomers who have
reanalysed observations made at the time say this finding strengthens the case
for a connection between the dramatic gamma-ray bursters and exploding
stars.

SN1987A, the brightest supernova recorded in more than 400 years, created a
sensation when it appeared in a neighbouring galaxy, the Large Magellanic Cloud.
Peter Nisenson and Costas Papaliolios of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for
Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts, made high-resolution images of the
exploding star 30 and 38 days later.

These images showed a spot with about a tenth of the brightness of the
supernova about 17 millionths of a degree away. At the time, scientists
published papers about this spot, Nisenson says, but they never reached any
consensus on what it was.

Using state-of-the-art image-processing techniques, Nisenson and Papaliolios
have now reanalysed their images and have found another less bright spot on the
other side of the supernova, about 42 millionths of a degree away. “The two
spots and the supernova were aligned, strongly suggesting we were seeing a
two-sided jet emerging from the explosion,” says Nisenson. Their results, which
will appear later this year in Astrophysical Journal Letters, suggest
that matter was ejected by the explosion in a jet moving almost as fast as
light.

In January, another jet firing off directly towards the Earth
coincided with a powerful gamma-ray burst
(This Week, 3 April, p 5).
The source of such bursts—enormously powerful flashes
of gamma rays from near the edge of the
visible Universe—has been a matter of heated debate. But if supernovae
create jets, as the new results suggest, this would provide compelling evidence
that the sources of gamma-ray bursters and powerful explosions of stars are
one and the same thing.

Bohdan Paczynski, an expert on gamma-ray bursters at Princeton University in
New Jersey, says this link is intriguing: “It’s a giant step in a direction I
like a lot.” But he warns against generalising too much. “We should be aware of
the possibility that not every supernova has a relativistic jet, and not every
relativistic jet must produce a gamma-ray burst.”

More evidence for the link was announced by Brian Schmidt of the Australian
National University in Canberra last week. He says the postion of a gamma-ray
burster in 1997 coincided with an unusually bright supernova.

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up

Popular articles

Trending New Scientist articles

Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop