Subscribe now

BRAINWAVE recordings really can betray what a person is thinking. Patrick
Suppes of Stanford University in California recorded the brain-waves of five
volunteers as they read 100 sentences. The recordings for each volunteer were
taken over 24 sessions and then averaged to give a typical pattern for each
sentence.

Suppes then showed each volunteer the 100 sentences in a random order, and
compared their brainwaves to the patterns recorded before. For one volunteer, he
correctly identified 93 per cent of the sentences. His worst result, identifying
9 per cent of the sentences, was still significantly better than guessing.

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up

To continue reading, subscribe today with our introductory offers

Popular articles

Trending New Scientist articles

Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop