Subscribe now

Kees van Deemter: The importance of being vague

By Liz Else

10 March 2010

Editorial: We need to think precisely about vagueness

In his book Not Exactly, Kees van Deemter argues that the very foundations of science don’t come in black and white.

Forgive the oxymoron, but how do you define vagueness?

A vague concept allows borderline cases. The potential confusion is that people think vagueness is when they don’t quite get what someone means. For people in my area of logic, it’s actually a much narrower phenomenon, such as the word “grey”. Some birds are clearly grey, some are clearly not, while others are somewhere in between. The fact that such birds exist…

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up

To continue reading, subscribe today with our introductory offers

More from New Scientist

Explore the latest news, articles and features

Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop