Subscribe now

Health

Trials highlight worrying flaws in psychiatry 'bible'

Testing psychiatry's new diagnostic handbook has flagged problems in diagnosing several mental disorders

By Peter Aldhous

16 May 2012

New Scientist. Science news and long reads from expert journalists, covering developments in science, technology, health and the environment on the website and the magazine.

Diagnosis: uncertain

(Image: Plainpicture/ÉS)

Read more:‘Label jars, not people’: Lobbying against the shrinks

HOW reliable is reliable enough? When it comes to diagnosing mental illness, most people would want the bar set pretty high, which is why the latest revision of psychiatry’s diagnostic manual has become mired in controversy – again.

Last week, at its annual meeting in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the American Psychiatric Association revealed results from “field trials” of diagnoses proposed for the next edition of the APA’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, or DSM-5. Essentially, the trials asked whether doctors would come to the…

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up

To continue reading, subscribe today with our introductory offers

Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop