Subscribe now

Comment

Should we rename some cancers to make them sound less scary?

A cancer diagnosis is life-changing, yet some tumours pose little threat, meaning some are calling for a new name. The idea is not without risks, says Charles Swanton

By Charles Swanton

24 January 2019

man looking happy in doctor's office

Reclassifying some conditions as “not cancer” could help conversations with patients

Hero Images/Getty

“You have cancer” is awful to say, worse still to hear – a gut-wrenching first step along a desperately uncertain journey. The subsequent conversation invariably revolves around a plethora of averages, and test results that, while increasingly sophisticated, are far from perfect.

But should everything we currently call “cancer” have that title? In this week’s BMJ, Laura Esserman argues that breast lumps known as ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS), which almost never spread and are rarely lethal, should no longer be called cancer. Instead, she proposes…

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up

To continue reading, subscribe today with our introductory offers


Popular articles

Trending New Scientist articles

Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop