Letters archive
Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
11 March 1995
From Ronald Eccles, University of Wales, Cardiff
The article on the veil of secrecy surrounding peer review of research grants and scientific research publications made a case for reviewers to come public (Forum, 11 February). Another issue is the anonymity of the applicants for grants and publications. The opinion of the reviewer is very much influenced by the academic standing of the …
11 March 1995
From C.P.R. Saunders, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology
I see from Letters (4 February) that there is a race on to claim to be the first to have used a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to study snowflakes. The Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1970, vol 96, p 257, shows SEM images obtained by me in 1969. Note, however, that these are images …
11 March 1995
From Andy Linkin, St Peter's College, Oxford
Wood happens to be a fairly good biomass fuel, since it can be burnt in the form of chips in a power station (Letters, 11 February), and can also be fermented to make ethanol and methanol, which would be both more efficient and more "green" as a car fuel than electricity. However, trees take a …
11 March 1995
From Graham Hollingsworth, Peter Taylor, Mark Burbidge and Jonathan West
Your correspondent T. Robertson argues that the higher apparent efficiency of transport driven by internal combustion engines compared with the electrical alternatives means that combustion engined vehicles have a lower environmental impact (Letters, 11 February). This argument is regularly advanced by motoring interest groups to justify perpetuation of the status quo. It is false in …