Letters archive
Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
18 November 1995
From Richard Griffiths, The Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, University of Kent, Canterbury
Your report that it may be impossible to breed Australian frogs in captivity without in vitro fertilisation underestimates the potential of amphibians in captive-breeding programmes (This Week, 7 October). Many frogs, including some Australian species, have been successfully bred in captivity for several generations using conventional methods. Indeed, amphibians may be more appropriate for captive-breeding …
18 November 1995
From Don Williamson, University of Liverpool, Port Erin Marine Laboratory, Isle of Man
Your article on getting research papers published cites the case of X, who challenges the big bang theory but who has yet to submit his own rival theory for publication (Forum, 28 October). I am writing to warn X to expect rejections from many journals when he eventually submits a paper on his theory. I …
18 November 1995
From Paul Davies, University of Adelaide, South Australia
Ralph Estling raises the old problem of what existed prior to the big bang (Letters, 28 October). Because the big bang represents the origin of time itself, "prior" is meaningless when applied in the normal, temporal sense. However, one may still use the word prior in a logical or explanatory sense, as something more fundamental. …
18 November 1995
From Tom Nash and Jeremy Henty
In order to clarify whether or not Einstein was wrong about the relative speed of clocks (Letters, 21 October) we need to bring in the equality of inertial and gravitational mass. Take four identical clocks: one on Earth at g gravity, one on a rocket in space accelerating at g, one on a centrifuge in …
18 November 1995
From Julian Metcalfe, Royal Institute of Navigation, Animal Navigation Group, Lowestoft, Suffolk
I've followed with interest the recent correspondence (2 and 30 September and 21 October) about pigeons hitching rides on the London Underground. Those of us involved in studies of animal navigation will recall the definition of migration proposed by the late John Kennedy: "Migratory behaviour is persistent and straightened-out movement effected by the animal's own …