Letters archive
Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
2 March 1996
From Chris Hoare, Karen Krska and Kevin Smith
I note with interest that Tam Dalyell (Thistle Diary, 16 December 1995) was informed by junior home office minister Tim Kirkhope that tail docking was effectively barred by the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons. Your article "Off with their tails" (Focus, 30 September 1995, p 16) makes it plain that this is not the case. …
2 March 1996
From Les Stocker and Hugh Warwick
With regard to "Injured hedgehogs killed by human kindness" (This Week, 3 February, p 10), if you actually read the paper printed in The Veterinary Record it becomes fairly obvious that the hedgehogs mentioned were not killed by human kindness but by being released in a sub-optimal condition. The only hedgehog with severe dental problems …
2 March 1996
From Keith Franklin and P.F. Perry
I am afraid that James Follett is incorrect then he states that, "The entire English-speaking world refers to the # symbol as a hash" (Letters, 3 February, p 57). Having just returned from two years spent working in Massachusetts I can inform him that in the States # is referred to as "the pound sign" …
2 March 1996
From Robin and Gwen Page-Wood
In his admittedly self-indulgent article, "Going for green in France", (Forum, 6 January, p 41), Ian Fells mentioned the cutting down of 200-year-old oaks to make way for more Eurowheat at Château des Fours. As owners of this venerable relic, we hasten to put right what is obviously an editorial error: it was not we …