Letters archive
Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
12 April 1997
From David Wilson, Simon Brenman
Stroud, Gloucestershire The preparatory negotiations for this year's Climate Change Convention in Kyoto appear to consider only half the problem of rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide ( "Chill winds at the summit", 1 March, p 12 ). It is essential to include both sources and sinks of CO 2 when attempting to establish the …
12 April 1997
From Douglas Stewart, University of Aberdeen
Aberdeen Three years ago you ran a story and an editorial on my work on the driver's optical illusion that causes children to be killed or injured in road accidents (This Week, 18 June 1994, p 4 and Comment, p 3). This work had wide coverage. What should have followed was research and development by …
12 April 1997
From Ted Gullison and Richard Rice, Imperial College and Conservation International
London and Washington DC It has come to our attention that some sources are misconstruing Bob Holmes's article on mahogany to imply that we advocate logging mahogany to save the forest ( This Week, 22 February, p 10 ). This is not the case. Our report focused on what is done with forests after mahogany …