Letters archive
Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
31 March 2001
From Piotr Krysiak, Wythenshawe Hospital
One of the most distressing aspects of the epidemic of foot and mouth disease now ravaging Britain's farms is pictures of stacks of animals being burnt, with thick clouds of dark smoke blowing in the wind. As a surgeon I routinely use electrocautery in my work. It has been known for some time that live …
31 March 2001
From Chris Lawson, University of Melbourne
Ken Aitken (10 March, p 56) refers to research on autism in northern Finland and its apparent finding that autism has increased fourfold among Finnish children. What Aitken didn't say is that the study's authors conclude that the most likely reason for any increase in the figures is that doctors and parents have got better …
31 March 2001
From Paul Harper-Scott, Faculty of Music, University of Oxford
Sarah Ransdell's research into essay writing while under the influence of background music (17 March, p 17) throws up a very unimpressive statistic: people produce one fewer word a minute if they are listening to music. Is music the important factor here? I suspect they may produce one fewer word a minute if the Sun …
31 March 2001
From Gregory Deyermenjian
The ancient city of Machu Picchu was neither a "stronghold" nor was it the "last refuge of the Inca empire after it was overrun by Spanish conquistadores in the 16th century" (10 March, p 20) . The inclusion of these long-discredited notions in your article may distract from the credibility of your more immediate message …