Subscribe now

Letters archive

Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com


24 November 2001

Dope on dope

From Robert Sharpe, The Lindesmith Center Drug Policy Foundation

You're absolutely right. Even if every myth about cannabis causing "reefer madness" were true, the harm caused by the drug would not justify sending users to prison (3 November, p 3 and p 12) . The zero tolerance approach both victimises users and harms society at large. Prisons transmit violent habits and values rather than …

24 November 2001

Letter

From Maia Szalavitz

David Fergusson was quoted as saying that he "can't explain away" the correlation between marijuana use and subsequent hard drugs use found in his study in New Zealand. But the hardly radical Institute of Medicine, part of the US National Academy of Sciences, discredited the "gateway theory" that marijuana leads to hard drugs use in …

24 November 2001

Letter

From Don Churms

You report that: "Although two-thirds of cannabis users [in the New Zealand study] did not progress to other illicit drugs, nearly all hard-drug users started off on cannabis." Could it not be that most teenagers—and also most adults—use some sort of mild drug, such as cannabis, nicotine and alcohol, and that a smaller subset of …

24 November 2001

Letter

From Galen Ives

I was sorry to see you fall for an old statistical (or philosophical) chestnut. "The link is undeniable," you say of the New Zealand study that showed 99 per cent of hard drug users started with cannabis. An unpublished study of my own reveals that 100 per cent of all drug users and alcoholics started …

24 November 2001

Prion priorities

From Sean O'Malley

The causes of the BSE blunder are clear (27 October, p 14) . First, spending only £217,000 on such a critical experiment was clearly stupid. I have received far larger grants for carrying out far less important research. Secondly, that Whitehall was in any way involved in the science of the experiment was just plain …

24 November 2001

Reflections on paper

From Ivan Erill

Karlin Lillington fails to note the main advantage of e-paper—reflection (27 October, p 36) . Through millions of years, evolution has provided us with a couple of eyes that are exquisitely tuned to perceive light reflected from objects, but clearly unsuited for looking straight at light-emitting objects. Cathode ray tubes and all other would-be paper …

24 November 2001

Bellotto's cities

From John Feather

Your correspondent Peter Listkiewicz is confusing Antonio Canaletto with his nephew Bernardo Bellotto (10 November, p 55) . It was Bellotto who painted Warsaw, Dresden and Vienna, and who started the confusion by trading on his uncle's name.

24 November 2001

Skyscraper safety

From Matthew Stevens

The skyscraper rescue platform is an excellent idea (3 November, p 24) . But it is sad that it took the tragedy of the attack on the World Trade Center to get people to take it seriously. Two other ideas occurred to me that could be used to complement the platform, and they'd be cheaper. …

24 November 2001

Asbestos risks

From Chris Lodge

Your article states: "From next June, all owners of business premises in Britain will have to make safe any asbestos in their buildings" (10 November, p 25) . Under the 1974 Health and Safety at Work Act, they already have an obligation to make safe any asbestos in their premises. What the writer refers to …

24 November 2001

Monumental flaws

From Elizabeth Young

Mike Pitts is wrong to say that opponents of the Highways Agency's Stonehenge road scheme risk "losing the entire scheme" (27 October, p 51) . What arouses opposition to the scheme in its present form is the idea that the road tunnel should be short, so that its cuttings and permanently lit portals, and some …

24 November 2001

Semiopathy rules

From Keith Huggett

Feedback introduced the term "semiopathy" – the tendency to read inappropriate emotions into signs – to the world (10 November) . But am I the only one to note the tendency of semiopathic manifestations to achieve the total opposite of their apparent aim? Take the heroic campaign of the lollipop ladies of Britain over the …

24 November 2001

Letter

From Pete Furness

It must be a sign of science fiction addiction that every time I see the roadworks sign "Caution heavy plant crossing", I think: "Beware triffids!"

24 November 2001

Letter

From A. C. Harper

A sign on the garden gate of a house near me bears the words "loose Alsations". I don't know whether to look out for dogs roaming freely, to free captive dogs, take a bag and buy a couple of kilos of them, watch where I put my feet, or criticise their morals.

24 November 2001

Letter

From Richard Postance

I thought I would tell you of a sign I saw while driving in Oxford. Here, as part of a traffic-calming scheme, a sign proclaims "Humped Zebra Crossing—400 yards". Although I slowed to look, I saw nothing of note.

24 November 2001

Correction

The box story in Feedback on 10 November described a Yorkshire Building Society mortgage application form with product information listing a maximum mortgage of 95 per cent. It has since come to our attention that the Yorkhire Building Society does in fact offer 100 per cent mortgages. We apologise if any other impression was given …

Issue no. 2318 published 24 November 2001

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop