Letters archive
Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
11 January 2003
From Gareth Roberts, Sciona Ltd
We read your story about over-the-counter gene tests with initial interest that was followed by a sense of despondency at the misleading and selective nature of its facts and reporting (23 November, p 42) . There is a well-founded molecular and chemical basis to our knowledge of the role of nutrients in body chemistry, a …
11 January 2003
From Paul McDermott, Institute of Food Research
This is not necessarily about sloppiness, though I am sure it is a factor. Anyone who has tried to get hold of a list of articles will realise just how difficult it is to obtain some of them. Establishments rarely hold old or obscure journals, and ordering copies can be costly, especially for cash-strapped institutions. …
11 January 2003
From William A. Krohley, Kelley Drye and Warren LLP, Attorneys for Union Carbide Corporation
The article on the Bhopal disaster is incorrect in many important respects (7 December, p 6) . First, the evidence is not "fresh". The documents referenced very likely have been in the hands of the Indian government for many years, and none contains information contradicting the facts as they have been long expressed by Union …