Subscribe now

Letters archive

Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com


6 April 2005

Pollen squabbles

From Keith Alexander

Kurt Kleiner's report on ancient forests misses the point that palynology – the study of pollen and spores – is not a precise science (12 March, p 11). Fraser Mitchell's paper is a case in point. The percentages of tree pollen in dated deposits provide very rough measurements and it is inconceivable that these can …

6 April 2005

Internet in the sky

From Geoff Willis

Ensuring that "black box" voice recorders have battery back-ups seems sensible (5 March, p 4). However in an era when the smallest of companies routinely backs up its files to a remote location, storing data at the point of production, never mind 8 kilometres up in the air, seems a little outdated. At any one …

6 April 2005

Touchy telephones

From Tom Shannon

I very much enjoyed your review of the current developments in tactile communication devices (26 February, p 28). Considering how much of our brains are devoted to touch it's surprising how long it has taken tactility to enter telecommunications. When I patented the first system for tactile telephone communications back in 1973 I imagined it …

6 April 2005

Self-igniting ciggies

From Chris Rundle

Your item about self-lighting cigarettes stirred memories buried in a haze of ancient smoke (19 March, p 25). The Israelis may be about to patent the idea, but the British beat them to it – by about 40 years. Self-igniting ciggies were sold, albeit briefly, in tobacconists' shops in the UK in the 1960s, along …

6 April 2005

For the record

• In our feature about organic transistors (19 March, p 38) our wording incorrectly implied that Bertram Batlogg had recently moved from Bell Labs to the Technical University of Zurich. He actually moved in 2000. We should also emphasise that he and all other co-authors of Hendrik Schön's work were cleared of any scientific misconduct.

6 April 2005

Teenage bullies

The researchers into bullying at the University of Minnesota asked schoolchildren to say how aggressive their classmates were and also which members of the opposite sex they would ask to a party. They concluded that "boys have high status with their male peers if they are bullies, and girls like them". They may have asked …

6 April 2005

Climate feedbacks

From Almuth Ernsting

Neil Fisher (5 March, p 32) suggests that most of the global warming projections of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change are flawed because, he thinks, there must be negative feedbacks which will counter global warming (5 March, p 32). He believes that, without such negative feedbacks, the climate would not have been stable over …

6 April 2005

Progress bar patents

From David Coker

Contrary to Alan Stephenson's assertion (19 March, p 29) Richard Stallman did not give an example of how a so-called "software patent" impedes development (5 February, p 28). Stallman made that claim, but gave no example of any development that has actually been impeded. He also omitted to point out that, as can readily be …

6 April 2005

Unfathomable thinking

From Malcolm Lamming

In Paul Davies's article on the emergence of life, the positions of the reductionists – who claim life can be predicted from the laws of atomic physics – and of those who support "strong emergence" – who believe additional laws emerge at various levels of complexity – were I thought very well described, and I …

6 April 2005

Wind-powered boats

From George Jackson

Referring to the matter of wind power for ships, I tried this out in a 29-foot (9 metre) yacht some years ago. It was clear to me that the major advantage would be that the line of traction could be made to pass much closer to the line of resistance through the keel. In principle …

6 April 2005

How the rich rule

From Henry Law, Land Value Taxation Campaign

It is very interesting that the wealth of the majority of people fits a curve that describes the energies of atoms in a gas (12 March, p 6), but there is no mystery here. The underlying reason for this skew was explained in 1879 by the economist Henry George, who showed it was caused by …

6 April 2005

Smokers' clean air

From Rowan Fothergill

You draw attention to the need for better ventilation on passenger planes during outbreaks of diseases such as SARS (19 March, p 15). When smoking was permitted on aircraft, cabin air was circulated and replaced to a far greater extent than at present. Banning smoking on aircraft in effect greatly reduced the air quality, as …

6 April 2005

Dirty hydros

From Graham Faichney

Philip Fearnside believes emissions from reservoirs should be included in calculations of a country's carbon budget. But the claim that hydropower projects are net producers of greenhouse gases is not correct (26 February, p 8). Carbon released from reservoirs is part of the "contemporary" carbon cycle, as it was recently drawn from the atmosphere by …

6 April 2005

Sense and homeopathy

From Jack Mott

I think the mention of homeopathy in your article about things that don't make sense ( 19 March, p 30 ) is incomplete without some mention the BBC TV Horizon programme on this topic, the transcript of which is at www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2002/homeopathytrans.shtml The Belfast results you report were tested with a double blind procedure and came …

6 April 2005

Sense and cold fusion

From Terence Tarnowsky, Purdue University

I found David Nagel's statement comparing our understanding of cold fusion to that of superconductivity before it was explained by John Bardeen, Leon Cooper and Robert Schrieffer to be misleading (19 March, p 30). Prior to their theory the phenomenon of superconductivity was an experimentally proven result that could be reproduced in many different materials. …

6 April 2005

We'll meet again

From Alec Cawley

The scenario you describe in the experiments on altruism, that individuals have frequent "one-shot" interactions with strangers, who they never interact with again, is very unlike the real world (12 March, p 33). The fact that you have met someone once means that you have something in common, and thus may meet them again. In …

Issue no. 2494 published 9 April 2005

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop