Letters archive
Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
6 April 2005
From Henry Law, Land Value Taxation Campaign
It is very interesting that the wealth of the majority of people fits a curve that describes the energies of atoms in a gas (12 March, p 6), but there is no mystery here. The underlying reason for this skew was explained in 1879 by the economist Henry George, who showed it was caused by …
6 April 2005
From Terence Tarnowsky, Purdue University
I found David Nagel's statement comparing our understanding of cold fusion to that of superconductivity before it was explained by John Bardeen, Leon Cooper and Robert Schrieffer to be misleading (19 March, p 30). Prior to their theory the phenomenon of superconductivity was an experimentally proven result that could be reproduced in many different materials. …