Subscribe now

Letters archive

Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com


7 January 2009

Multiversality

From Peter White

Amanda Gefter contends that we are being offered a choice between God and a multiverse as explanations for our existence (6 December 2008, p 48) . Consider a third possibility: that our universe is an artefact created by an advanced species and contained within the universe in which that species exists. It would be difficult …

7 January 2009

Something for nothing

From John Turner

Lawrence Krauss seems to have strayed into the foothills of metaphysics without realising that he hasn't brought the proper equipment (22 November 2008, p 53) . He starts with the question "why is there something rather than nothing?" and claims that physics has largely answered this question by "reframing" it as "how" rather than "why". …

7 January 2009

Mathematics is hard

From John Campion

Marcus du Sautoy declares that we can all do mathematics because we are naturally programmed to do so (29 November 2008, p 44) . Being able to survive by moving around in the world and manipulating objects in it with speed and precision has nothing whatever to do with mathematics. The survival skills he alludes …

7 January 2009

Sex, lies and surveys

Prompted by the article on sexual strategies (29 November 2008, p 32) , I took a small informal poll at the school where I work. Seventeen out of 20 boys and six out of 10 girls said they would probably lie on a questionnaire about their sex life, even if they completed it anonymously. If …

7 January 2009

Menstrual chaos

From Laura Spinney

Caroline Williams writes of the menstrual synchrony effect in humans, first described by Martha McClintock in the 1970s, that, "McClintock's conclusions remain contentious because nobody has yet isolated the actual chemicals that cause the effect" (6 December 2008, p 38) . They remain contentious because of much more than that. Others have tried and failed …

7 January 2009

Dog standard

From Sally Morgana and Sally Damms, Weimaraner Club of Great Britain

Weimaraner Club members were disappointed to read Paul McGreevy saying that the breed standard for Weimaraner dogs – which demands that the chest is "well developed, deep" while the abdomen is "firmly held" and the flank is "moderately tucked-up" – "may help to make Weimaraners appear athletic, but puts them at risk of gastric dilation …

7 January 2009

Animal welfare

From Marc Bekoff, University of Colorado, Boulder

I was thrilled to read A. C. Grayling on our duty towards fellow animals (29 November 2008, p 50) . Severe restrictions on invasive animal research are long overdue, and the European Union's proposal to ban all but behavioural research on great apes is an important step forward. Those who think "good welfare" is good …

7 January 2009

The private brain

From Peter Harrison

Douglas Fox describes work that seems to imply that the conscious brain needs to be inactive for the subconscious one to work (8 November 2008, p 28) . I would say that the requirement is that it should be inactive only on the topic of concern and that activity on unrelated topics is a necessary …

7 January 2009

Eco-charging

From Jay M. Pasachoff

In your eco-questions and answers, your discussion of how best to charge a laptop left a major topic unanswered: what if you use the laptop as a main computer, normally just plugged into the mains – or "to the wall" as we say in the US (15 November 2008, p 36) ? Is it better …

7 January 2009

Tamed, who?

From Frank Spence

Piers Bizony says "recent military events in Georgia have reminded that Russia may not yet be a fully tamed member of the international community" (15 November 2008, p 22) . The way the UK and the US go rampaging round the world, bombing at will, raises an obvious question.

7 January 2009

Multiversality

From Jim Scott

Amanda Gefter may have inadvertently answered her own question in posing her third option for explaining the fine-tuning of the universe to our existence: "we somehow endow the universe with certain features by the mere act of observation" (6 December 2008, p 48) . For observation presupposes consciousness, and in eastern philosophies god is consciousness …

7 January 2009

Something for nothing

From Angus Jenkinson

A something-for-nothing universe epitomises the hubris that is one feature of the contemporary science scene. Krauss outlines Alan Guth's inflation, which describes a flat universe which trades off the positive energy of particles for the negative energy of gravity to provide a "free lunch" (22 November 2008, p 53) . According to Krauss, this resolves …

Issue no. 2690 published 10 January 2009

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop