Letters archive
Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
18 February 2009
From Daniel Dennett, Jerry Coyne, Richard Dawkins and Paul Myers
What on earth were you thinking when you produced a garish cover proclaiming that "Darwin was wrong" ( 24 January )? First, it's false, and second, it's inflammatory. And, as you surely know, many readers will interpret the cover not as being about Darwin, the historical figure, but about evolution. Nothing in the article showed …
18 February 2009
From Sherry Seethaler, University of California, San Diego
A. C. Grayling suggests that "an international consortium of universities should set up panels to audit the worth of websites" (17 January, p 44) . Considering the volume of information online and its exponential growth, any such undertaking would be outdated before it could report. We should not worry about the transcription errors that Grayling …
18 February 2009
From William Hughes-Games
The New Zealand coal industry recently announced that it will cut production by 20 per cent due to a 30 per cent decrease in overseas steel manufacture. Is this part of a world trend? It will be interesting to see this year's figures for the levels measured at the carbon dioxide sampling centre at Mauna …
18 February 2009
From Daniel Dennett, Jerry Coyne, Richard Dawkins and Paul Myers
What on earth were you thinking when you produced a garish cover proclaiming that "Darwin was wrong" (24 January) ? First, it's false, and second, it's inflammatory. The subtitle, "cutting down the tree of life", made matters worse. The cover story is about recent discoveries of horizontal gene transfer, chimeras, and endosymbiosis: but since Darwin …