Letters archive
Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
29 April 2009
From Anna Gilmore, Anna Gilmore is at the University of Bath, Michelle Sims, Michelle Sims is at the University of Bath, Ken Judge, Ken Judge is at the University of Bath, Linda Bauld, Linda Bauld is at the University of Bath and Bobbie Jacobson, Bobbie Jacobson is at the London Health Observatory
David Robson's article discussing the mud-slinging aimed at those who do not accept the anti-smoking lobby's views on passive smoking (4 April, p 34) should remind us that policy debates involving the tobacco industry have always been contentious. The key issue is always to get the science right. This will be helped by the rigorous …
29 April 2009
From Douglas Bettcher, Tobacco Free Initiative, World Health Organization
Further to Helen Thomson's article on the effects of smoking an electronic cigarette (14 February, p 33) , it must be emphasised that the World Health Organization is not certain that research funded by manufacturers of these products is independent or legitimate. This is particularly true in the absence of sufficient information to evaluate the …