Subscribe now

Letters archive

Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com


27 May 2009

Brain silo

From David Roser

Your article on C. P. Snow's legacy prompted me to wonder why his thesis that there are "two cultures" is considered to be false (2 May, p 26) . His worries about the compartmentalisation of thought and knowledge, otherwise known as subject specialisation, still seem valid to me. Snow's concern was about the failure of …

27 May 2009

Your carbon ration

From Guy Robinson

Catherine Brahic's online article, "Humanity's carbon budget set at one trillion tonnes" (staging.newscientistbeta.com/article/dn17051) implies a frightening statistic. If we are to collectively emit no more than 250 billion tonnes of carbon in order to reduce the probability of a 2 °C warming to 25 per cent, then for today's population we each have only 36 …

27 May 2009

Fish that see red

From Colin Bruce

The underwater photographs taken by Nico Michiels, revealing that the eyes of some deep-sea fish glow red, will strike an eerie chord with many optical engineers (4 April, p 38) . The red fluorescence around gobies' eyes reminded me of a similar arrangement used in CGI filming. A ring of monochromatic LEDs surrounds the camera …

27 May 2009

Lost in publication

From Nigel Blower

The front cover of your 9 May issue flaunts the headline: "The mysterious monopole – predicted by theory, hunted for decades, found at last". Exciting news, I thought, until I reached the cover story inside and found a very different description: "They are not exactly the monopoles of physics lore, but they could provide us …

27 May 2009

Barrage alternatives

From Ian Middleton

Reading Fred Pearce's article on the Severn barrage, it strikes me that there are viable alternatives (18 April, p 32) . Imagine a steel tank 150 metres long by 100 metres wide, open at the bottom, and anchored to the seabed at a depth where its top is above water at high tide and its …

27 May 2009

Detrimental bans

From Max Whisson

David Robson's article on the zeal of the anti-smoking lobby was rather more cautious than it could have been (4 April, p 34) . I have spent years looking for published evidence that environmental tobacco smoke is dangerous to health, but have failed to find any. We see plenty of papers on the presence of …

27 May 2009

A hint of flint

From Andrew McWilliams

Erich Plaut's comments, reported in Feedback, about the absurdity of comparing the taste of wine to that of stone (9 May) show that he was never a student of geology in the 1970s. My father told me it was common practice to taste rocks to help identify them. I'm not sure his stones were crushed, …

27 May 2009

Pentagonal power

From John Davies

It is ironic that in the week the Enigma puzzle featured a pentagon with each apex joined to a central point, Chrysler filed for bankruptcy (2 May, p 24) . The Chrysler symbol is just such a pentagon. Not nominative determinism: perhaps predictive semiology?

27 May 2009

For the record

• It must be the rising sea levels that did it: what else could have shifted southern Bangladesh a couple of thousand kilometres west of where it belongs on our map of the world's low-lying areas (9 May, p 37) ?

Issue no. 2710 published 30 May 2009

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop