Letters archive
Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
22 July 2009
From Frank Jackson, World Disarmament Campaign
John Horgan reports the welcome but unsurprising finding that war is not an inevitable result of human nature (4 July, p 38) . I have argued this throughout my 60 years of peace campaigning. Humans are complex beings: aggressive and conciliatory; competitive and cooperative; individualistic and socially minded; but not killers by nature. The psychological …
22 July 2009
From Bill Wilson, Member of the Scottish Parliament
Debora MacKenzie's article gives the impression that the UK has a uniform flu-testing strategy that was likely to miss many cases of transmission within communities (23 May, p 10) . This is not the case: Scotland has its own health policy. The First Minister assured me last month that Scotland is at the forefront of …
22 July 2009
From Peter Brugger, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich
Your letters pages have been replete with claims of priority for the experimental induction of out-of-body experiences ( 11 April, p 22 and 6 June, p 26 ). None of these predates George Malcolm Stratton's 1899 report of carrying a mirror device on his shoulders for several days which produced an image of his walking …
22 July 2009
From Andrew Lee, Editor, The Engineer
Diego Gambetta and Steffen Hertog (13 June, p 26) suggest that in the psyche of engineers lurks something that makes them more predisposed to terrorism than doctors, linguists, historians, or even sociologists. Even if we accept their claim that engineering graduates are over-represented in the ranks of violent radicals from the Islamic world, it's quite …