Subscribe now

Letters archive

Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com


2 September 2009

The sum of our parts

From Mark Gordon

For each of the human traits discussed in your article "10 Mysteries of you" (8 August, p 28) , the authors imply that if one explanation is correct, the others must be false. In the real world, however, no one selective pressure acts on a trait in isolation. Rather, a multitude of collaborative, conflicting and …

2 September 2009

Cough mixture

From Ian Dickson

Bob Holmes warns us that the second wave of a pandemic flu outbreak tends to be worse than the first (8 August, p 40) . The most likely explanation for this increased severity is the near certainty that there will be a reassortment of genes between a mild pandemic strain of the virus and some …

2 September 2009

Fry panned?

From Annemieke Wigmore

In a sidebar to her article on gorillas, Stephanie Pain tells us of the disastrous repercussions for these primates of cellphone production: "If you must have a new , then recycle the old one to reduce demand for coltan... Illegal mining of coltan ore is partly responsible for the plummeting number of eastern lowland gorillas …

2 September 2009

Tuna meltdown

From Marion Foley-Fisher

In his article on tuna stocks, James Joseph provides good figures for their status, correctly highlighting bluefin tuna as being of greatest concern (1 August, p 22) . He goes on to say that three tuna stocks are at risk, one is recovering, one is slightly at risk and another may recover. As conservation initiatives …

2 September 2009

Fringe benefit

From Perry Bebbington

Andrew Stiller complains that your editors and contributors are harming New Scientist 's reputation by taking cold fusion seriously (8 August, p 24) . I have to defend your approach. Cold fusion may be on the fringe of science and it may be extremely unlikely ever to work at all, let alone as a viable …

2 September 2009

Myriad minutiae

From David Coker

Although like John Cooke I am proud to be a pedant (8 August, p 25) , I have no problem with James Dyson's use of the phrase "quantum leap" (11 July, p 20) to imply a large progressive step. The novel aspect of a quantum of energy, when the concept was introduced to physics just …

2 September 2009

Beyond belief

From Brett Porter

I would like to believe that you weren't intentionally ironic when you illustrated George Marshall's "Are you a believer?" article on climate change with an ostrich with its head in a planet of sand (25 July, p 24) . This aspersion on the bird's survival skills has been well publicised as being false, yet it …

2 September 2009

For the record

• Nearly two years ago, in an article on early human migrations (27 October 2007, p 36) , we mislabelled the Wally's Beach archaeological site as being in the US, when its position on our map correctly shows it to be north of the border in Canada. • Serguei Komissarov, whose calculations on gamma-ray bursts …

Issue no. 2724 published 5 September 2009

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop