Subscribe now

Letters archive

Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com


16 September 2009

It's a miracle

From Derek Bolton

Hugh McLachlan rightly points out some logical flaws in philosopher David Hume's arguments regarding miracles, but introduces some others in turn (8 August, p 26) . McLachlan writes: "'Laws' that appear firmly established are often overturned, yet we do not need to argue that a miracle must have occurred... the rational thing is to abandon …

16 September 2009

Panel envy

From Peter Bridgewater, UK Joint Nature Conservation Committee

E. O. Wilson calls for "an effort along the lines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to protect species" (22 August, p 23) . The UN Environment Programme has already proposed an Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) to discuss improving biodiversity protection. If there were two processes in development, the effort …

16 September 2009

More on methane

From Guy Cox

Kirk Smith's reply to Graham Faichney's well-reasoned letter about the place of biogenic methane in the carbon cycle, and hence its diminished impact on climate change misses some important points (8 August, p 24) . Wetlands are being drained for farming, thereby permanently removing large sources of methane. Loss of carbon to the atmosphere from …

16 September 2009

Inventive process

From Robert Cailliau

W. Brian Arthur's article on the evolution of technology fails to pay attention to what goes on inside inventors' heads (22 August, p 26) . A frantic evolution of ideas occurs that no one sees and that even the inventor may be unaware of. To onlookers it may seem that a technology appears fully formed, …

16 September 2009

Planet Pluto

From Iain Brown

As Stephen Battersby's article shows, debate continues within the astronomical community over the status of Pluto and many other significant celestial bodies in the solar system (25 July, p 44) . This is not surprising when the term "planet" is so ill-defined. Clear definitions enable us to talk the same scientific language. As more extrasolar …

16 September 2009

Cerebral computers

From Richard Cragg

I am disappointed by Noel Sharkey's dismissal of Hans Moravec's and Ray Kurzweil's assertions that computers will eventually overtake the human brain in intelligence as "just fairy tales" (29 August, p 28) . There is plenty of evidence that new properties emerge when systems reach a certain complexity, and it can be difficult to predict …

16 September 2009

Black box satellite

From Gerry Nolan

Questions on the safety of modern aircraft raised in your report on the loss of an airliner in the mid-Atlantic on 1 June may never be answered if the plane's "black box" flight recorders cannot be found (13 June, p 19) . The drawback of the current system of on-board black boxes is that they …

16 September 2009

For the record

• We should have made it clear that when discussing carcinogen content, the smokeless tobacco product to which we were referring was moist snuff (22 August, p 5) . • Changfeng Chen is at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, not Jiao Tong University in Shanghai as we stated (5 September, p 39) .

Issue no. 2726 published 19 September 2009

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop