Subscribe now

Letters archive

Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com


7 July 2010

Spotted history

From Frank Goodman

Climate sceptics are prone to ignore indicators of global warming when it suits them, but their protagonists can be guilty of a similar process – suggesting particular research is "flawed" or, worse, by making personal attacks on the researcher. Stuart Clark did not mention Theodor Landscheidt 's research when describing David Hathaway's work in his …

7 July 2010

Not so wonderfuel

From Andreas Firewolf

Helen Knight's article suggesting methane as a solution to the energy crisis read like an advertisement from the gas industry (12 June, p 44) . The article mentions nothing about the amount of energy that it takes to free the methane from the rock where it is held. The cost of extracting and burning coal …

7 July 2010

Mapping knowledge

From David Allen

Discussions of tacit and explicit knowledge, such as that made by Harry Collins (29 May, p 30) , often run afoul of the map-versus-territory confusion: the map is an abstraction of the territory, it isn't the territory itself. The map explicitly shows many features, but it necessarily leaves out other details – tacit knowledge. It …

7 July 2010

Kind lies

From Elaine Morgan

Dorothy Rowe makes some valid points about the potentially disastrous consequences of lying (19 June, p 28) , but she may have spent so much time treating people who are emotionally disturbed that she has forgotten how the rest of us behave. She says we often tell white lies out of fear of being abandoned …

7 July 2010

Observing altruism

From Shyam Rangaratnam

I was struck by the juxtaposition of Mark Nelson's letter, which challenged the value of natural experiments (1 May, p 24) , and Mark Buchanan's summary of the work of Ernst Fehr on human fairness (p 26) . Fehr's experiments will never truly show the influence of fairness on motivation if he doesn't step out …

7 July 2010

Pyxis dust

From Joanna Jastrzebska

Further to Feedback's discourse on the subject, it must be the time of year when "differently real" creatures are getting more active (22 May) . Last week I had a concordant encounter in my workplace, a psychiatric ward. A nurse asked me if I could countersign medication she was about to get "from the pixies" …

7 July 2010

For the record

• When we mentioned the University of Calgary in our article on evolvability we placed it in the wrong city: it is, naturally enough, in Calgary not Edmonton. And apologies to Abby Drake of the University of Manchester, whose surname we got wrong in the same article (26 June, p 46) . • On our …

Issue no. 2768 published 10 July 2010

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop