Letters archive
Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
4 August 2010
From Amanda Baker, The Vegan Society
Bob Holmes assesses the environmental argument for giving up eating meat (17 July, p 28) , tacitly accepting the broad scientific consensus that current animal-farming techniques have unsustainable environmental impacts. However, it is not just meat that is implicated in such damage, but all products we derive from farmed animals. The Vegan Society has reviewed …
4 August 2010
From Helena Paul and Ricarda Steinbrecher, EcoNexus
Like Tom Wakeford and Jackie Haq (26 June, p 26) , we were part of the group overseeing the preliminary dialogue between scientists and members of the public, discussing breakthroughs in synthetic biology with a view to gauging their response to the new technologies. We consider that during the dialogue, several scientists made statements about …
4 August 2010
From Peter Cox and Hazel Jeffery
Clive Hamilton's article on the debate over geoengineering highlights a regrettable tendency for discussion of climate change to be polarised by political dogma (17 July, p 22) . Hamilton mentions as proponents of geoengineering right-wing think tanks opposed to fossil fuel cuts on political grounds. However, increasingly, reputable scientists are considering the effectiveness of geoengineering …