Letters archive
Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
11 August 2010
From Rudi Van Nieuwenhove
In your article on the search for the Higgs particle, it is implicitly assumed that the Higgs exists (24 July, p 8) . This hope is shared by many physicists, and it was one of the main motivations for building the Large Hadron Collider. However, a small group of physicists, myself included, is challenging this …
11 August 2010
From Peter Boyd, Carbon War Room
In his article on geoengineering solutions to climate change, Clive Hamilton criticises our promotion of "market-driven solutions" (17 July, p 22) . Here at the Carbon War Room, we are monitoring the debate on geoengineering, but are primarily focused on the 50 per cent of climate change solutions that can be implemented profitably using existing …
11 August 2010
From Nick Enfield, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
Reg Clough is sceptical about Christine Kenneally's assertion that the language Lao, which is spoken in Laos, has no adjectives (24 July, p 26) . But it is Clough who is wrong. In my reference grammar of that language, based on 17 years of fieldwork, I show that Lao has a full complement of property-denoting …
11 August 2010
From Morton Satin, Salt Institute
The piece "A sprinkling of doubt" (1 May, p 22) demonstrates the degree to which advocacy and subjective opinion continue to dominate the debate over salt and health. Without referring to specific publications, the authors attempt to cast doubt on researchers who have published papers contradicting the need to reduce our salt intake by linking …