Letters archive
Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
25 August 2010
From Stan Brown, Forensic Science Northern Ireland
I was disappointed by your article "Between prison and freedom" (14 August, p 8 and p 5) . I can state confidently that DNA profiling, regardless of public perceptions, is not "generally seen as infallible" by forensic science organisations. DNA profiles may often be partial, or mixed (or possibly contaminated), but even obtaining a clear …
25 August 2010
From James E. Cleaver, University of California, San Francisco
Wade Allison suggests we are being over-cautious in our safety limits for ionising radiation (31 July, p 24) . He pursues the elusive idea that there could be a safe level of radiation for the human population. But his article conflates two different issues, one scientific and the other societal. The best available scientific evidence, …
25 August 2010
From Heinz-Uwe Hobohm, University of Applied Sciences Giessen-Friedberg
I was extremely interested in your discussion of the effects of fever (31 July, p 42) . In 1996, while working in Germany on a cancer project at the University of Bremen, I stumbled on a 1951 paper by Louis Diamond and Leonard Luhby on spontaneous remission in childhood leukaemia ( Journal of American Medicine …
25 August 2010
From Joyce D'Silva, Compassion in World Farming
It is extraordinary that you devoted so many pages to animal cloning while failing to acknowledge the suffering it causes (Instant Expert, 7 August) . About 20 per cent of cloned calves die during or shortly after birth, and an additional 15 per cent before weaning, according to the European Commission's Group on Ethics in …