Letters archive
Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
13 October 2010
From Susie Watts, Co-Habitat
Rosaleen Duffy claims the tragic drowning of 23 illegally trafficked cockle-pickers in Morecambe bay, north-west England, "revealed some stark realities about the international wildlife trade – how it is driven by wealth not poverty" (11 September, p 28) . This problem has existed for decades. Since the 1970s, each surge in the main wildlife markets …
13 October 2010
From Dagmar Hanold, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide
In her article on the premature death of eucalyptus trees, Wendy Zuckerman cites a paper claiming that the eucalypt tree disease Mundulla Yellows (MY) is caused by environmental factors (11 September, p 44) . However, my colleagues and I published a paper in an earlier issue of the same journal which shows that MY is …
13 October 2010
From Mike Weale, Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, King's College London
I fully agree with David Eagleman (25 September, p 34) that true science should really occupy the probabilistic, evidentially consistent middle ground between God and atheism, and indeed between false certainties everywhere. But why does he have to label this sort of thinking "possibilian"? What's wrong with "Bayesian"? It is equivalent, older, beautifully quantifies the …