Subscribe now

Letters archive

Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com


8 December 2010

Science sceptics

From Michael Duff, Abdus Salam Professor of Theoretical Physics, Imperial College London I enjoyed Milena Wazeck's analysis of the thought processes of those who denied Einstein's relativity (13 November, p 48) . Yet it all sounded eerily familiar. Phrases such as "when people don't like what science tells them, they resort to conspiracy theories, mud-slinging …

8 December 2010

Improbable progress

From Tim Stevenson

Simon Williams waxes sniffily about the arbitrarily set "fiddle factor" in Petr Horava's theory on how to unify quantum theory and relativity (18 September, p 27) . Copernicus came up with a passable theory of the movements of the solar system. Would Williams scoff at the fact that this, too, is full of fiddle factors, …

8 December 2010

Future of the story

From Sophie Mayer, Department of English, King's College London

John Bickle and Sean Keating ponder the implications of digital technology on our internal narrative, and thus our sense of self (13 November, p 52) . However, their arguments rest on two interlinked fallacies: that written narrative has always been the primary mode of storytelling; and that these narratives have always been linear and goal-oriented. …

8 December 2010

Now you see it

From Peter Reynolds

Ben Haller dismisses as "silly and vacuous" the assertion that up to 80 per cent of our mental experiences are verbal (30 October, p 31) . It is not. Haller bases his criticism on his own assertion that "every second, I probably process more raw visual percepts than the number of words that go through …

8 December 2010

Off colour

From Clay Farris Naff

From the headline to the final quote, Helen Thomson's article on auras was just sensationalism (20 November, p 14) . As reported, the experiment lacked controls, which are especially important when the evidence comes through a subject's report. If there were controls, they should have been reported. If you choose to include the greatly overreaching …

8 December 2010

Human robots

From Mohammad Mehdi Daneshi

Supposing that the concept of guilt is made obsolete by hard-wired brain functions, Bill Foster proposes that the purpose of judicial punishment is either deterrence or retribution (6 November, p 28) . I think there is a third possibility. If we humans are just very complex robots without genuine free will, we can punish and …

8 December 2010

Evolution of art

From Pat Scott Vincent

Valerio Cugia wonders whether preferences for different types of art may vary with geography (16 October, p 27) . Jerome Kagan suggests in his book The Temperamental Thread: How genes, culture, time and luck make us who we are , which you reviewed this year (24 April, p 47) , that the different preferences for …

8 December 2010

Pest pets

From Simon Grove

Whatever the actual or perceived health benefits of pet ownership (6 November, p 30) , a more comprehensive evaluation would consider the many costs borne by the rest of society, particularly as a result of dog and cat ownership. Taxes are diverted from other worthwhile causes to pay for the infrastructure of pet ownership: dog-walking …

8 December 2010

For the record

• The beetles pictured in our article on genetic inheritance were stag beetles, not broad-horned flour beetles as the article implied (13 November, p 17) .

Issue no. 2790 published 11 December 2010

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop