Subscribe now

Letters archive

Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com


15 December 2010

Impossible frontier

From Michael Hartley

Theunis Piersma's article regarding the health issues of weightless space flight, while certainly correct about the biology (13 November, p 30) was incredibly pessimistic. Artificial gravity should solve all the physiological issues mentioned. While the exact level of artificial gravity required to maintain health is unknown, Earth's gravity would likely be the upper limit. Constant …

15 December 2010

Animal empathy

From Mike Flattley

I was disappointed that Douglas Fox's otherwise enjoyable article on anthropomorphism left unexamined the empathy felt by people in hunter-gatherer societies for the animals they hunt (27 November, p 32) . In David Attenborough's series The Life of Mammals , one episode focused on Kalahari bushmen and "persistence hunting". This examined a hunter's techniques and …

15 December 2010

Did the west win?

From Andreas Keller

When explaining the effect of biology and geography on the supremacy of western science, Ian Morris writes: "People in Australia, Siberia or sub-Saharan Africa stuck with hunting and gathering" (30 October, p 32) . With respect to sub-Saharan Africa, this is plainly wrong. In his book The Civilizations of Africa: A history to 1800 , …

15 December 2010

Robotic semantics

From Jeff Karpinski

I read Colin Barras's article on literacy in robots with interest as well as some amusement, given the quirks and vagaries of the English language (27 November, p 22) . It is easy to envision a robot-owner presenting his digital charge with a task list consisting of: dust the floors; prepare two rabbits for tonight's …

15 December 2010

Flipping navigation

From Bob Tarzey

Reading about the mechanisms by which animals use magnetism for navigation (27 November, p 42) prompted me to wonder how they cope when the Earth's magnetic poles reverse, which happens on average every 300,000 years. Not only would the poles reverse, but the field strength would weaken during the time of change, perhaps being close …

15 December 2010

Bounding into the air

From Trevor Boardman

Mark Schrope's interesting article on electric aeroplanes (6 November, p 40) did not mention the possibility of using cables or catapults to launch or assist planes into the sky. To an outsider, it seems that such a technique could reduce kerosene usage because the fuel used would not have to be lifted into the sky.

15 December 2010

Quantum patricide

From John Healey

Why is the grandfather paradox so named (20 November, p 34) ? Surely the same effect would be achieved and the same paradox would result if you travelled back in time and killed one of your parents before they met. Why not call it the father paradox or the mother paradox? Yours, a nervous grandfather.

15 December 2010

For the record

• We misspelled the name of Eberhart Zrenner in our article on retinal implants (6 November, p 10) . • In our diagram showing the human and Neanderthal evolutionary tree, the label for present-day humans should have read " H. sapiens with up to 4% Neanderthal genes" (4 December, p 32) .

Issue no. 2791 published 18 December 2010

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop