Letters archive
Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
26 January 2011
From Alex Scott, Edinburgh Business School
The correspondence (8 January, p 24) regarding Dan Hind's proposal to put research funding to the popular vote (11 December 2010, p 26) reminded me of a project I was involved in, under the inspiring leadership of the late Phil May of the University of California, Los Angeles. Phil knew of Arrow's impossibility theorem: that …
26 January 2011
From David Flint, Humanists4Science
Mohammad Mehdi Daneshi argues that he can create a justification for judicial punishment by describing a person as a "human robot" (11 December 2010, p 29) . "If our human robot malfunctions, it is quite proper to take steps to correct him or her," he says. How are we supposed to decide what constitutes a …