Subscribe now

Letters archive

Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com


2 March 2011

Too much salt?

From Tom Capes

I tend not to read my copy of New Scientist in page order. As a result, I came across your article about medical myths ( 12 February, p 40 ), which stated that "it's not just tabloid newspapers that misrepresent medical statistics for dramatic effect", before the "Insight" column (p 11) about employing "taste bud …

2 March 2011

Mad cow count

From Deborah Thurston

As a member of the team from the Agricultural Research Service, part of the US Department of Agriculture, that confirmed and genotyped all the US cases of BSE (mad cow disease), I would like to offer a couple of corrections to your story about the demise of the disease (29 January, p 6) . There …

2 March 2011

Population problem

From Barbara Sommerville

I cannot understand why the doom-laden reports about limited resources I read in New Scientist , such as your recent interview with Lester Brown (5 February, p 27) , never spell out the blindingly obvious cause of impending global calamity: overpopulation. I realise that spelling this out is politically incorrect, but when things are so …

2 March 2011

Dark matter belief

From Rudi Van Nieuwenhove

As a non-believer when it comes to dark matter, I was disappointed by your biased article on the subject ( Instant Expert, 5 February ). Dan Hooper gave the impression that evidence for dark matter is all around us. The small column "Did we get gravity wrong?" gave a different explanation for the higher-than-expected speeds …

2 March 2011

Compossibilites

From Stephen Wilson

Brian Greene explains the "many worlds" interpretation of quantum mechanics (5 February, p 30) by stating "if quantum mechanics predicts that X, Y and Z are possible, with different probabilities, then X, Y and Z will actually happen. All possible outcomes occur, but in different universes." This implies that the interpretation might ignore what the …

2 March 2011

Ancient encryptions

From Martin Gregorie

You report that software manufacturers are moving towards the use of full-disc encryption to protect computer data (29 January, p 17) . It has in fact been a standard part of the Linux operating system for at least two years. It works by encrypting information on parts of the disc using a password, which is …

2 March 2011

Elementary

From Martin van Raay

Having read your interview with David Ferrucci of IBM about the company's Watson supercomputer, and having seen a picture of it, I am utterly unimpressed by the fact that it competed on the quiz show Jeopardy! (12 February, p 27) . What is so "super" about a computer that can beat two humans if it …

2 March 2011

3D dogs

From Elizabeth Girling

Feedback recently asked for evidence to support the idea that some dogs have better spatial awareness than others (12 February) . This immediately caught my attention, because of a simple experiment I once carried out on a couple of dogs: the first a Labrador retriever, the second a German shorthaired pointer. In turn, I took …

2 March 2011

Beer paradox

From Paul Garcia

John Peisley complains that his beer has become less affordable, as its price has increased 32-fold while his salary has only gone up by a factor of 13, from £4000 to £52,000 (19 February, p 31) . In 1972 my salary was £1000; now it is £42,000. Following Peisley's reasoning, I should find beer more …

2 March 2011

What's in a name?

From Jamie Walker

In response to Alan Chattaway's call to name the phenomenon of something being known more widely by an erroneous name than by its correct one (29 January, p 25) , I would like to suggest "hoovariation". The number of times I have heard people incorrectly refer to their vacuum cleaner must be inversely proportional to …

2 March 2011

Brain buster

From Tony Cheney

I think we should be careful about constructing maps of our brains (5 February, p 32) . I remember a science fiction story, I think by Arthur C. Clarke, about a team of neuroscientists who worked for years to construct a highly accurate map of brain functions. When the leader of the team eventually came …

Issue no. 2802 published 5 March 2011

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop