Subscribe now

Letters archive

Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com


13 April 2011

Nuclear futures

From Andrew Stirling

Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex At a crucial stage in the still open-ended nuclear developments in Japan, you assigned four pages to exploring how nuclear power might be "rescued" ( 26 March, p 8 ), and only a short piece on the consequences in Japan (26 March, p 6) . You question the …

13 April 2011

Perceiving risk

From Roy Harrison

You ask why people tend to fixate on the risks of nuclear power when statistics show that fossil fuels kill more people (26 March, p 10) . I suggest the reason is not so much the deadliness of nuclear power as its ability to inflict economic damage, in particular the fear that your house, your …

13 April 2011

Aviation uncertainty

From Paul Steele

Air Transport Action Group The certainty of your headline "Contrails heat more than aircraft fuel" (2 April, p 16) belies the real nature of the research on which it is based. Scientists are still a long way from agreeing on the climate impact of contrails and related cirrus cloud, or even clouds in general. The …

13 April 2011

Cities of the future

From Nicholas Green

In your article about how to rebuild civilisation from scratch (26 March, p 40) , the diagram of the "ideal city" looks eerily similar to Ebenezer Howard's design for a "Group of Slumless, Smokeless Cities" from his 1898 book Tomorrow: A peaceful path to real reform , although the scales are a little different. Likewise, …

13 April 2011

Civilisation of teeth

From Peter Shaw

Your article on "Homo civicus" referred to recent evolutionary changes in Homo sapiens that suggest the continual refinement of our bodies (19 March, p 36) . One additional line of evidence that wasn't mentioned is the reduction in human tooth size over the past 10,000 years, which, unlike bone thickness, cannot be a direct response …

13 April 2011

Perfect relative pitch

From Malcolm Shute

Ed Douglas's article on why some people have perfect pitch (26 February, p 46) makes a number of credible proposals but does not mention mirror neurons. When a musician with perfect pitch hears a note played by someone else, they might go through the motions in their mind of attempting to emit the same sound. …

13 April 2011

Split brain

From Stuart Butler

In his article on the nature of self, Julian Baggini says that "in the 1960s Roger Sperry and Michael Gazzaniga famously severed the corpus callosum in several people with epilepsy" (12 March, p 34) . In fact Philip Vogel and Joseph Bogen were the neurosurgeons who carried out what became known as the "split brain" …

13 April 2011

Barely literate

From Tony Compton

Has anyone pointed out the delightful Freudian nature of your error in the passage: "there is a depiction of a horned bison hovering over the lower body of a naked woman that bares an uncanny resemblance to Picasso's etching" ( 12 March, p 54 )?

13 April 2011

Down to moon

From John Coburn

I enjoyed the article by Greg Klerkx about private ventures sending rovers to land on the moon in competition for the Google Lunar X Prize (5 March, p 46) . But I was perplexed by the parachutes bringing rovers onto the moon's surface pictured in the image on the opening spread. They would, I imagine, …

13 April 2011

For the record

• Marlene Zuk is at the University of California, Riverside, not San Diego (2 April, p 32) .

Issue no. 2808 published 16 April 2011

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop