Letters archive
Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
6 July 2011
From Adrian Bowyer, University of Bath
In his letter (25 June, p 32) Alan Sangster accused Erle C. Ellis of taking a rose-tinted view of humankind's relationship with the Earth in his article on the Anthropocene. My response would be to say that Sangster is guilty of taking an unduly bleak view when he calls us a "belligerent, warlike and rapacious …
6 July 2011
From Chris Street, University College London
The article "Hoodwinked!" (25 June, p 46) was a breath of fresh, optimistic air for those of us researching the detection of lies. To make practical use of such research, a number of outstanding questions need answers. Does increased cognitive load increase the number of false confessions? How should an investigator elicit a truthful statement …
6 July 2011
From Eric Scerri, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California
Lay persons and some chemists complain that newly synthesised and other exotic elements are of no practical use, and that any attention paid to them is more or less a waste of time. How wrong they are is demonstrated by James Mitchell Crow's interesting article "Unsung elements" (18 June, p 36) . It is good …
6 July 2011
From Neil Shirtcliffe, Nottingham Trent University
I have done some research on the breathing of water spiders (18 June, p 20) and was surprised by the results reported, because my work, and that of others, suggests that the air trapped on a spider's abdomen – a much lower surface area than the bubble nests mentioned – is enough to sustain the …