Letters archive
Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
12 October 2011
From Michael Crawford, Imperial College London
Your article "A brief history of the brain" (24 September, p 40) was wonderful, but missed an important point. During its first 2.5 billion years, life was largely anaerobic. It is likely that during this phase, synthesis of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) would have been limited. DHA is a major essential fatty acid constituent of the …
12 October 2011
From William Price, University of Wollongong
I was quoted in your report on a transgenic fish that fluoresces when exposed to oestrogenically active chemical contaminants (11 June, p 16) . My comment, as used, is slightly ambiguous. To clarify, the creation of a transgenic fish that glows in the presence of oestrogenically active compounds in the water is an advance, and …
12 October 2011
From Quentin de la Bedoyere, Science editor, Catholic Herald
As someone charged with communicating science in a Catholic newspaper, I am not helped by Royal Society president Paul Nurse's attacks on anti-science (17 September, p 5) . The Catholic church is on official record as saying that material human evolution is compatible with religious faith. But science, by definition, has nothing to say about …