Letters archive
Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
20 December 2011
From Morton Satin, Salt Institute
I found Graham Lawton's article on dietary salt rather disappointing (3 December, p 46) , not because it disagreed with my own point of view, but because it stuck to the establishment line. It is beyond the scope of this letter to go into the mass of peer-reviewed data, including the very recent paper from …
20 December 2011
From Liz Barker and Crawford Hollingworth, The Behavioural Architects
Henry Farrell and Cosma Shalizi question the ethics and effectiveness of "nudging" people into making better choices (5 November, p 28) . Such questions are sound and justified. We should worry about whether we are manipulated by government. However, most behavioural economists would argue this does not deny people choice and democratic freedom. Terminology is …