Letters archive
Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
7 March 2012
From Mike Hulme, University of East Anglia
In your editorial "Don't cloud young minds" you play straight into the hands of those seeking to perpetuate a confrontational agenda on climate change (25 February, p 3) . You cite a 2010 study, "Expert credibility in climate change" , that similarly mis-frames climate science as a bipolar confrontation. There are more constructive ways of …
7 March 2012
From Harold Cohen, www.aaronshome.com
Your article on computer art focused on Simon Colton (14 January, p 42) , who says his Painting Fool program will "wake up in the morning and look at the newspaper headlines" and so produce art that is meaningful to the audience, because it is essentially drawing on the human experience. I suspect the folk …
7 March 2012
From Ivan Erill, University of Maryland
You do a disservice to Ian Stewart and your readers by not even labelling each of the seven equations that his witty and craftily written piece elaborate on (11 February, p 34) . You usually make a point of accompanying articles with boxes and insets that clarify points the average reader may not be familiar …