Letters archive
Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
6 June 2012
From Brian Josephson, 1973 Nobel prizewinner in physics
Your article on human rationality (26 May, p 32) asks: "Have you ever, against your better judgement, nurtured a belief in the paranormal?" It continues: "If you buy into any of these beliefs, you are probably suffering from confirmation bias – the mind's tendency to pick and choose information to support our preconceptions, while ignoring...evidence …
6 June 2012
From Alessandro De Angelis, Physics coordinator of the MAGIC telescope
Astronomer Geoff Marcy assumes that extraterrestrials might try to communicate with us by pointing lasers at Earth (31 March, p 28) . This possibility has been studied. If they know about our civilisation, such beings would point at the telescope dish with the largest reflecting surface. If our mutual position in the Milky Way allows …
6 June 2012
From Timothy Johnson, Heriot-Watt University
In your story "Roulette beater spills his secrets" you wrote that in the 1970s, Doyne Farmer, then a graduate student, used the world's first wearable computer to beat roulette tables in Nevada's casinos (12 May, p 12) . I believe the first wearable computer was conceived in 1955 and deployed in 1961 by Edward Thorp …
6 June 2012
From Marc Abrahams, Founder of the Ig Nobel prize ceremony
Your review of Philip Ball's book Curiosity (19 May, p 50) ends: "Yet for all its erudition, his book does not quite succeed in capturing the difference between Nobel and Ig Nobel prizewinning curiosity." Nobel prizes recognise (in theory and usually in fact) curiosity that led to extremely good things. Ig Nobel prizes recognise curiosity …
6 June 2012
From Dr Richard Symonds, Consultant psychiatrist
The article by James Davies, "Label jars, not people" (19 May, p 7) about protesters lobbying the American Psychiatric Association's meeting is relevant, but there are a few points to make. Psychiatrists do not label people. They label disorders of mental health. And the protesters highlight that the Diagsnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders …