Letters archive
Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
12 December 2012
From Cathie Martin, John Innes Centre group leader, and editor-in-chief of The Plant Cell
The study by Gilles-Eric Séralini and colleagues at the University of Caen in France linking cancer tumours in rats with maize modified to resist the herbicide Roundup, has been judged by the European Food Safety Authority to be scientifically unsound because of inadequacies in its design, reporting and analysis (8 December, p 7) . As …
12 December 2012
From Tommy Ohlsson, KTH Royal Institute of Technology
The editorial and cover story in your 10 November issue (p 3 and p 34) discuss the aftermath of this year's grandest scientific finding – the discovery of a new boson, most likely the Higgs – along with a possible successor to the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). First, we must clarify beyond doubt that the …
12 December 2012
From Nick Medic, London, UK
Your online article by Michael Brooks on the UK energy bill asked if British consumers are prepared to shoulder the higher initial costs of energy from renewables ( 26 November ), and touched on some interesting aspects of decision-making theory. His view seems to be that experts broadly support further decarbonisation, even if it increases …
12 December 2012
From Guy Cox, Australian Centre for Microscopy & Microanalysis, University of Sydney
In your article on omniphobic materials, you credit Christoph Neinhuis and Wilhelm Barthlott with the discovery of the water-repellent properties of plant epicuticular waxes in 1997 (24 November, p 46) . Without in any way detracting from their work, I would point out that Barrie Juniper's pioneering electron microscope work on epicuticular waxes at Oxford …