Subscribe now

Letters archive

Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com


2 January 2013

Think global

From Mutsuyoshi Nishimura, Ex-chief climate negotiator for Japan

I read your account of California's carbon trading scheme with interest (24 November, p 14) . I am glad economist Luca Taschini said "the best scenario would be one global market" rather than national or regional markets. For several years I have been advocating a global carbon market scheme to begin in 2020. Rather than …

2 January 2013

Bright star

From Martin Rees, Astronomer Royal

I would like to add a little to your report on the death of astronomer and The Sky at Night broadcaster Patrick Moore (15 December, p 9) . He always described himself as an amateur astronomer – and indeed that is what he was, in the sense that he had no degrees, and had never …

2 January 2013

Incubator innovation

From Ralf Biernacki

There is no significant improvement in the survival rates of very premature babies as you reported (8 December, p 7) , because there has been no significant advancement in medical technology. Premature babies are still kept in incubators. The big barrier for earlier-born babies is maturity of the respiratory system, which is incapable of supplying …

2 January 2013

Breath of fresh air

From Piers Forster, Professor of climate change, University of Leeds

Further to your editorial and report on the outcome of the climate change summit in Doha, Qatar ( 15 December, p 5 and p 10 ), let's find the positives. I didn't hear anyone in Doha questioning the science or the need for urgent action. While many were lamenting the pace of the negotiations, the …

2 January 2013

Unclear case

From Josephine Quintavalle, Comment on Reproductive Ethics

Obstetrician Lisa Harris cites protocols on abortions for women who are miscarrying at US Catholic-affiliated hospitals, and by association presumes that the death of Savita Halappanavar in Ireland was due to that country's restrictive abortion law (24 November, p 29) . That this unfortunate mother asked for or was refused an abortion is far from …

2 January 2013

Fuelling the debate

From Paul Etherington

Coming from an engineering background, I was pleased to see that the only realistic alternative to fossil fuel for transport, namely biofuel from non-food crops, is at last attracting serious attention (8 December, p 34) . It was interesting to note, however, that most of the projects described are based in the US, with its …

2 January 2013

Ring theory

From Ron Baker

Your story on planetary rings and moon formation (8 December, p 18) is interesting, but Earth's moon seems too massive to have originated from a ring system. However, the possibility that early Earth had such a system supports the capture hypothesis for the origin of the moon. The moon could have been captured by Earth …

2 January 2013

Mind your language

From Bob Ladd, Professor emeritus of linguistics, University of Edinburgh

Mark Pagel suggests that human languages evolve in order to foster group identity (8 December, p 38) . And he highlights our linguistic diversity in comparison with animals, saying that you could take a gorilla, chimpanzee, donkey, cricket or goldfish "and plop it down anywhere these species are found, and it would know how to …

2 January 2013

ET self-destruct

From Shawn Steeves

Mathematical biologist Harold de Vladar seems to have overlooked a crucial factor in his efforts to use game theory to weigh up the losses and gains of broadcasting our presence to extraterrestrials, some of whom may be predatory (15 December, p 11) . Any alien species sufficiently hostile to make the trip all the way …

2 January 2013

Modified fears

From Chas Bazeley

For many Europeans, the antipathy towards genetically modified crops (13 October, p 8) stems less from their effect on our food than from the concern that their widespread introduction will enable powerful chemical companies to hold farmers to ransom over seed supplies.

Issue no. 2898 published 5 January 2013

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop