Subscribe now

Letters archive

Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com


16 August 2023

No machine will ever replace you, Annalee

From Rachel Mckeown, Cambridge, UK

Annalee Newitz highlights the threat of AI for the creative industry and those whose livelihoods depend on it, but surely I am not the only one who can see that their personality, interests and opinions shine through in every column? It is this personal flair, also seen in features with phrases and anecdotes written in …

16 August 2023

The real cause of obesity has yet to be confronted

From Pauline Keyne, Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire, UK

I doubt I am the only one alarmed by the idea of prescribing weight-loss drugs to children, as discussed by Clare Wilson. It comes amid studies showing that a rise in consumption of ultra-processed food is linked with a decline in physical and mental health ( 15 July, p 32 ). Manufacturers create ultra-processed foods …

16 August 2023

We can't just preach to rainforest nations

From David Myers, Commugny, Switzerland

Having visited Bolivia on several occasions, I found it spectacular. Moreover, as a scientist, I well understand the consequences of destroying its forests. However, I still have to question the nature of the commentary in your recent picture story on this. How can people living in higher-income countries suggest that Bolivians don't have the right …

16 August 2023

Your thoughts on how to think about new AIs (1)

From Eric Van, Watertown, Massachusetts, US

You write that "until we know what consciousness is, there is no solid way of testing for it" in an artificial intelligence. There is, in fact, a simple way of testing for it, provided the AI is incapable of lying about itself, has colour vision and hasn't been trained on the concept of "subjective experience" …

16 August 2023

Your thoughts on how to think about new AIs (2)

From John Andreae, Lower Hutt, New Zealand

You state: "Perhaps the relevant question isn't whether or not AIs can become conscious, but why we would want them to be conscious." If you see conscious awareness as the ability to express feelings, thoughts and intentions, then the importance of consciousness in robots that are to be useful assistants, carers or interesting companions is …

16 August 2023

Your thoughts on how to think about new AIs (3)

From Michael Harrington, Sydney, Australia

The consequence – or economic threat if you are personally affected – of AI is that armies of white-collar professionals, such as architects, lawyers and accountants, may become permanently redundant. You ask an AI: "Show me some designs for an east-facing beach house with a veranda and water views that backs onto a bush reserve." …

16 August 2023

One person's luxury is another's necessity

From Nigel Olliver, Darwin River, Northern Territory, Australia

I couldn't agree more with Madeleine Cuff's report regarding the carbon taxation of luxuries. However, defining a luxury is no simple matter. She mentions two examples, air travel and SUVs. Imagine three people – A, B and C – are all on the same plane travelling from a small rural town to the big city. …

16 August 2023

Costly space telescope is proving its worth

From Martin Whittle, Sheffield, UK

The James Webb Space Telescope was pricey at $10 billion, but the game-changing science that it is producing really makes it great value for money ( Letters, 22 July ). Your correspondent needs to see it in context and should save her ire for the oil companies that make huge profits by drilling for the …

Issue no. 3452 published 19 August 2023

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop