Letters archive
Join the conversation in New Scientist's Letters section, where readers can share their thoughts and opinions on articles and see responses from experts and enthusiasts across a range of science topics. To submit a letter, please see our terms and email letters@newscientist.com
16 October 2024
From Alwyn Eades, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, US
When it comes to common sense, it is worth noting that politicians and other public figures often use the phrase in a fairly specific way. In their usage, "it's just common sense" generally means, "I hope you will agree with me although I have no evidence to support my claim and experts in the field …
16 October 2024
From Jon Hinwood, Melbourne, Australia
Your piece on "common sense" focuses on what is common, but the primary quantity is sense. Focusing on sense instead explains most of the conflicts reported, since what each person considers sensible depends on circumstance, experience and the level of risk that they accept. Professional associations recognise the roles of each of these factors in …
16 October 2024
From Sam Edge, Ringwood, Hampshire, UK
The conclusion appears to be that it would be common sense to agree there is no such thing as common sense. Very Douglas Adams.
16 October 2024
From Mark Pallen and Aimee Parker at the Quadram Institute in Norwich, Nick Loman at the University of Birmingham, and Alan Walker at the University of Aberdeen, all in the UK
There is no "brain microbiome" in the sense of a resident microbial community present in the brains of healthy individuals. Instead, microbes enter such sterile tissues through the process of infection. While the role of infections such as Lyme disease in eliciting neurological symptoms may be under-recognised, this is distinct from the idea of a …
16 October 2024
From Bob Stock, Galashiels, Scottish Borders, UK
James Wong was spot on regarding the poor economics of growing your own produce. But it is important to also consider other, non-economic, factors. These include convenience and flavour – closely linked to freshness. But perhaps most important is the availability of what you want ( 21 September, p 44 ).
16 October 2024
From Blaise Bullimore, Haverfordwest, Pembrokeshire, UK
There are further factors that could affect city atmospheres and feasibly increase rainfall in urban areas: water vapour released by burning fossil fuels and the use of evaporative cooling ( 21 September, p 15 ). Multi-megawatt quantities of heat and plumes of saturated air are probably being emitted into ambient air around the clock via …
16 October 2024
From Alan Giles, Bournemouth, Dorset, UK
Matt Strassler is right regarding words used in physics that can mislead. Changing them might go a long way to clarifying things ( 21 September, p 32 ). For example, instead of using a word like "particle", give it a new name – "omet" – and then list the characteristics of omets. They are atomic …
16 October 2024
From Bryn Glover, Kirkby Malzeard, North Yorkshire, UK
5 October, p 40 In the interview with Sophie Koudmani, we read yet again of misgivings about the size of monstrous black holes in our early universe, and concern at the lack of time to reach such proportions. Would it be a silly or outrageous idea that such black holes may have existed before the …
16 October 2024
From James Fenton, Clachan Seil, Argyll and Bute, UK
Rowan Hooper's column about a future food revolution paints a seriously worrying dystopian picture. This vision would leave food production in the hands of corporations and subject to the vicissitudes of supply chains, political disruption and so on ( 14 September, p 24 ). The creation of megafarms already means farming is starting to come …