Subscribe now

Letter: Letters: Basking sharks

Published 6 July 1991

From R. EARLL

I welcome Leigh Dayton’s article on shark conservation (‘Save the sharks’,
15 June), but have to point out at least one error. Peter Gill, a biologist
with Greenpeace, was asked whether any of the world’s conservation organisations
have ever funded a shark campaign. His reply was no. Actually the answer
is yes, for at least one example – the basking shark in UK waters – has
been the subject of a campaign run by the Marine Conservation Society for
the last four years.

At present the joint nature conservancy councils are considering whether
the basking shark should be included on Schedule 5 of the Wildlife and Countryside
Act. The basking shark is in many ways equivalent to the cetaceans already
listed under the Act. With the cetaceans we have taken a precautionary approach
– action in the absence of adequate information, taken before the species
becomes endangered further and which provides a clear signal of concern.
It will be a great pity if future generations are deprived of seeing this
spectacular fish because of our lack of action and foresight.

R. Earll Marine Conservation Society Ross-on-Wye, Herefordshire

Issue no. 1776 published 6 July 1991

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop