Subscribe now

Letter: Letters: Rounding errors

Published 4 April 1992

From JIM LESURF

I am fully aware of the points Ross Anderson makes (Letters, 14 March)
regarding ‘A spy’s guide to chaos’ (1 February) – as he could have discovered
by reading some of the things I have previously published. Unfortunately,
he seems to have misunderstood what I wrote. This may be because the first
part of the article gave a conventional introduction to the topic, followed
by a more specific mention of some of the work presently under way. This
entails using a non-linear analog system as a generator, not a ‘function’
which is ‘implemented in fixed-precision arithmetic’. There is, therefore,
no ’rounding error’, and the system is both simple and fast.

The main limitation of such a system comes from the ‘real’ random noise
which arises in all practical systems. This restricts the degree of deterministic
complexity we can synthesise in a given situation, but not in quite the
same way as the problems which arise in digital computation. Noise occurs
in digital computers, too, but the ’rounding errors’ are usually a lot worse.

Jim Lesurf University of St Andrews, Fife

Issue no. 1815 published 4 April 1992

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop