Subscribe now

Letter: Letters: Twins win

Published 19 June 1993

From W. G. BURNS

I was delighted to read Mick Hamer’s piece (Technology, 24 April) describing
a proposed new oil tanker design with a twin diesel-electric propulsion
system which might have avoided the recent Shetland (Braer) oil disaster,
when water pollution stalled the ship’s single engine.

I have been actively criticising the technical design of oil tankers and
particularly liquid natural gas carriers since 1973, when I first saw a
design model of a large single-engine, single-rudder carrier intended to
carry bulk liquid natural gas from Sarawak to Japan. Since then I have
actively pressed in newspapers and journals for professional designs
incorporating twin engines, twin propellers, twin rudders, twin steering
engines plus fore and aft thrusters.

I note that even this new breakthrough oil tanker design has only a single
propeller with coupled engines, which means the crew could not steer it by
engines alone. This was a factor in the Amoco Cadiz, which fouled the coast
of northern France when its single-steering engine failed.

Why spoil this new, highly innovative design by not having full twin
redundancy, with twin propellers, twin rudders and twin steering engines?

W. G. Burns
Canberra, Australia.

Issue no. 1878 published 19 June 1993

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop