Subscribe now

Letter: Letters: Nothing new

Published 9 July 1994

From REVEL BARKER

‘Figures published this week show which universities earned most from
industry in 1992/3′ (This Week, 18 June). Not if you have reported them
accurately, they don’t.

They omit to mention Cranfield University, which would, on the figures
published, come second to London’s multi-college total, with Pounds sterling
10.61 million earned from industrial R&D in 1992/3. Cranfield’s industrial
income is equivalent to four times the amount it receives from research
councils.

Provided that no other high-earning university is omitted (shouldn’t
UMIST, Warwick and Heriot-Watt be in there, somewhere?) this makes Nottingham’s
£6.29m third, not second, and Cambridge’s £5.94m fourth, Oxford’s
£4.79m fifth, and so on.

Revel Barker Cranfield University Bedfordshire

* * *

Andy Coghlan writes: Company Reporting, the consultancy that compiled
the UK R&D Scoreboard for the government, drew its university statistics
from the University Statistical Record, a document published annually by
the Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (formerly UCCA). The USR
only included data on the ‘old’ universities funded by the now-defunct Universities
Funding Council. ‘New’ universities such as Cranfield will be included for
the first time in data for the year 1994-5, when the USR is taken over
by a new body called the Higher Education Statistics Agency.

Issue no. 1933 published 9 July 1994

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop