Subscribe now

Letter: Letters : Not so secondary

Published 12 October 1996

From Angèle and John Hamel, University of Southampton

Southampton

We were astonished that Stephen Wolfram thinks most of the important research
in his field is done by industry and that “universities are pretty secondary
entities” (“Millionaires’ row”, 14 September, p 33).

Is he not aware that Mathematica’s nearest competitor, Maple, was developed
in 1980 at the University of Waterloo, Canada, and continues to be closely
associated with the university? Or is this a subtle attempt to discount the
competition?

Issue no. 2051 published 12 October 1996

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop