Subscribe now

Letter: Letters : Against the odds

Published 3 May 1997

From Richard Smith

York

In your article on Keith Devlin’s Goodbye, Descartes, there is a
description of a “game show” in which the contestant chooses one of three doors
(Review, 12 April, p 42).

In fact, the odds of collecting the £10 000 hidden behind one of these
three doors must be 1/2, not 1/3 or 2/3 as the article says.

This is because after the host opens one of the doors with a banana behind
it, there are now two doors unopened. One has the £10 000 behind it, the
other has a banana; therefore the chance of picking the £10 000 is 1/2.
This is true whichever door is picked.

The “many people who refused [to pay £10 to change their choice]” were
therefore making the rational choice.

The solution in the review is actually correct—but it requires several
pages of the book to explain why. For a full explanation, go to Planet Science,
where you will find several site addresses dealing with the Monty Hall problem
and many more readers’ letters on the topic—Ed

Issue no. 2080 published 3 May 1997

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop