In the Focus article: “A wasted chance”
(30 May, p 22),
the figure of 16.9 million cubic metres of waste was
wrongly printed as 16.9 cubic metres.
Published 20 June 1998
In the Focus article: “A wasted chance”
(30 May, p 22),
the figure of 16.9 million cubic metres of waste was
wrongly printed as 16.9 cubic metres.
Issue no. 2139 published 20 June 1998