Subscribe now

Letter: On the road to disaster

Published 10 November 2001

From Tony Lovatt

Joe Costello writes: “The urgent challenge to science is to enter into a
dialogue that affirms its social relevance, and acknowledges that adherence to
‘irrational beliefs’ may ultimately lead to bold new horizons.”
(27 October, p 59).

I disagree. Science is a methodology for inquiry, not a proselytising
religion. If “the public” is increasingly turning away from the “objectivity and
impersonal perspectives” of science, the problem is society, not the scientific
method, which is unequivocally the best way of learning about the Universe the
human race has ever invented.

If the social relevance of science is to be enhanced, it must be done at a
social and political level, not a scientific one.

Bold new horizons? Rubbish. It is time and past time that the general
populace acknowledges that adherence to “irrational beliefs” may ultimately lead
to disaster and death.

Marton, New Zealand

Issue no. 2316 published 10 November 2001

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop