Subscribe now

Letter: Danger in a caterpillar's gut

Published 15 December 2001

From John Etherington

It is difficult to avoid genetic contamination from genetically modified
oilseed rape
(24 November, p 14).

Is this a surprise? Three years ago, you printed my letter warning of the
danger of transferring herbicide tolerance from GM rape into the closely related
weed, charlock (29 August 1998, p 49). I also mentioned that oilseed rape was,
by then, one of the commonest feral plants in Britain.

The greatest problem is seed spillage at harvest, plus the long life of seed
in soil. Here in west Wales virtually no roadside verge or previously cultivated
land is free of viable seed and once GM rape is widely sown it will behave
similarly.

Our neighbouring farmer neglected the seedlings from a previous rape crop and
by mid-summer almost every plant was seriously infested with cabbage white
butterfly caterpillars, which formed a larder for the local insectivorous birds
while the flowers were a magnet for hoverflies, honey bees and other
insects.

During gales these pollinators can be driven many tens of kilometres. A
caterpillar’s gut, being a seething microbiological morass, is an ideal
incubator for genes that can pass from plant tissue into bacterial species, and
foraging finches and chats then pick up the caterpillars.

The transfer scenario was completed as we watched a feeding finch explode
into a cloud of feathers as it was taken by a peregrine falcon—which no
doubt discarded the bird guts and dead caterpillars elsewhere. There is no
practicable separation distance that will prevent the genes from GM oilseed rape
mixing with the conventional crop.

Haverfordwest, Pembrokeshire

Issue no. 2321 published 15 December 2001

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop