Subscribe now

Letter: Letter

Published 6 July 2002

From Robert Shields, Editor, Trends in Genetics

It was obvious to anyone with a bit of experience in genetics and molecular biology that David Quist and Ignacio Chapella’s Nature article on Mexican maize should never have been published (15 June, p 14). I wrote to the editor the day the paper came out to point out the numerous flaws which demonstrated a failure of the refereeing process.

Nature unfortunately has a tendency to go for the “newsy” and this may have clouded its judgement in this case. Now it’s all good knockabout stuff to hint at some biotech conspiracy to silence Quist et al, but the science they present is unconvincing and does not meet the standards of science one would expect in a journal such as Nature.

London

Issue no. 2350 published 6 July 2002

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop