Subscribe now

Letter: Nanniebots in doubt

Published 17 April 2004

From Steve Taylor

After seeing your piece on “nanniebots” trapping chatroom paedophiles, I get the feeling I have read an unprocessed press release (20 March, p 23).

Given the quality of the chatterbots we see entering the Loebner prize each year, these are extraordinary claims, and need just a wee bit of confirmation.

The editor replies:

• If nanniebots can lead to investigations of paedophiles, as claimed by their inventor Jim Wightman, this is pretty persuasive evidence that they work. We have now learned from the UK’s National Hi-Tech Crime Unit, London’s Metropolitan Police and the FBI that they are unable to confirm that this has happened. Both UK agencies deny any active involvement with Wightman’s programs. If new evidence emerges, we will keep readers up to date.

Coburg, Victoria, Australia

Issue no. 2443 published 17 April 2004

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Scientist events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop